Law Firm Branding — “We Are So Mediocre!”

Both Sedgwick Detert Moran & Arnold LLP and Dilworth Paxson LLP have been celebrating their 75th anniversaries, but in different styles.

Here’s Sedgwick’s style:

Sedgwick 75

And here’s Dilworth’s

Dilworth Paxson

Quite a difference.

Sedgwick shows good style, but Dilworth uses an image from a video feed and it looks lousy.

Here’s what I don’t understand — why doesn’t anyone at Dilworth look at the firm’s home page, notice this lousy looking image, and say, “Hey! We’ve got to polish this.”

Now, Sedgwick has a site devoted to its 75th anniversary, but you can’t see it. And why not? Because of a mistake. That’s why.

The result of that mistake is this — when you try to visit that site, you’re asked over and over again to install Adobe Flash.

Here’s what I don’t understand — why doesn’t anyone at Sedgwick look at the firm’s home page, notice this flaw in function, and say, “Hey! We’ve got to fix this. And pronto!”

It’s incredible. Noticeable, year-old mistakes left untended.

Our Brand = “We make mistakes and don’t fix them. Heck, we don’t even notice them.”

____________
Update: the problem at Sedgwick was resolved just a day after this article was posted. Dilworth dropped the video feed image a few weeks later.

4 Responses to “Law Firm Branding — “We Are So Mediocre!””

  1. mz Says:

    Terrible, amateurish mistake. Asleep @ the wheel or just plain arrogance?

  2. Thorne Says:

    It’s a failure to apply a very basic principle — Anything Worth Doing Is Worth Doing Right!

  3. Chuck Says:

    The Sedgwick Web site has been fixed.

  4. Thorne Says:

    Better late, than never.

Leave a Reply

Attorneys are Authors and Law Firms are Publishers